Context
When you start the development of an application you often spend a significant amount of time putting in place the mechanisms to handle cross-cutting concerns. Examples of cross-cutting concern include:
- Externalized configuration - includes credentials, and network locations of external services such as databases and message brokers
- Logging - configuring of a logging framework such as log4j or logback
- Health checks - a url that a monitoring service can “ping” to determine the health of the application
- Metrics - measurements that provide insight into what the application is doing and how it is performing
- Distributed tracing - instrument services with code that assigns each external request an unique identifier that is passed between services.
As well as these generic cross-cutting concerns, there are also cross-cutting concerns that are specific to the technologies that an application uses. Applications that use infrastructure services such as databases or a message brokers require boilerplate configuration in order to do that. For example, applications that use a relational database must be configured with a connection pool. Web applications that process HTTP requests also need boilerplate configuration.
It is common to spend one or two days, sometimes even longer, setting up these mechanisms. If you going to spend months or years developing a monolithic application then the upfront investment in handling cross-cutting concerns is insignificant. The situation is very different, however, if you are developing an application that has the microservice architecture. There are tens or hundreds of services. You will frequently create new services, each of which will only take days or weeks to develop. You cannot afford to spend a few days configuring the mechanisms to handle cross-cutting concerns. What is even worse is that in a microservice architecture there are additional cross-cutting concerns that you have to deal with including service registration and discovery, and circuit breakers for reliably handling partial failure.
Forces
- Creating a new microservice should be fast and easy
- A service must implement cross-cutting concerns such as externalized configuration, logging, health checks, metrics, service registration and discovery, circuit breakers. There are also cross-cutting concerns that are specific to the technologies that the microservices uses.
Solution
Create a source code template that a developer can copy in order to quickly start developing a new service. A template is a simple running service that implements the required cross cutting concerns.
Resulting context
This pattern has the following benefits:
- a developer can quickly and easy get started with developing a microservice.
- it ensures that cross-cutting concerns are implemented in a standardized consistent way
This pattern has the following drawbacks:
- when the requirements for cross cutting concerns change, you must update existing services individually.
This pattern has the following issues:
- you need a service template for each programming language/framework that you want to use. This can be an obstacle to adopting a new programming language or framework.
Example
Examples of microservice chassis frameworks:
- Java
- Go